Apparently, whether or not we overlay sincere emotional elements or not, everyone is limited in their freedom of choice by their heritage. Ignoring this, at your own peril, and you will automatically project onto others your image. When they don't react as expected, you will react as expected.

1. Warriors, intellectuals, and tribal are genetic population segments with distinctive attributes and characteristics forcing distinctive predictable activities.

2. Warriors are descendants of the Norse invasion of Europe. Some results were good, others caused continual wars and made our national perceptions reflect the warrior perception of good, evil, and what is success.

3. I will be paying more attention to the tribal segments later on. Tribal plays a part of the U.S. society, on the other hand, they are not a part of the larger contest between the intellectuals and warriors which is the main issue here.

4. Intellectuals and warriors don't seem to intermarry on a regular basis. This extends the divide to additional generations.

5. To the warriors, the only success is conquering. If conquering is impossible, the warrior must fight on to prove themselves to the loyalty group.

6. To the intellectual any physical violence diminishes the glory of victory.

7. Aggressive and remorseless, the European warrior culture easily conquered all other civilization and still remains the best warriors. Other warrior cultures are the Japanese and the Arabs (not all Muslims).

8. Warriors, having their horizons attached to fighting, rarely become good administrators. Eventually the intellectuals are required to set things straight before the society is conquered by a better organized warrior neighbor.

9. The U.S. Constitution specifically does two things; the writers were well aware of their importance; the ability to change leadership of the country without violence and protecting the intellectuals from the warriors. This is why the warriors feel uncomfortable with "activist" judges who are really following the traditions of the Constitution. Warriors feel their desires shouldn't be interfered with by the intellectuals as the warriors have conquered and conquering means not being questioned or being bothered by the concept of checks-and-balances. In fact, "checks-and-balances" are not part of the warrior thought process: it's just annoying.

10. Warriors may initiate a war, whether a necessary war or for emotional needs, if they possess three things: 1. enough wealth, 2. young people who want to die to prove their value to their loyalty group, and 3. a leader who wants to fight.

1. Faith
2. Society order defines by external forces such as a bible
3. External force - "God" - cannot be sublimated by   individual
4. Unable to understand intellectual arguments
5. Loyalty to group is primary
6. All arguments are personal attacks - only "evil" people would challenge the group perceptions
7. Facts are those things that protect the loyalty group
8. The purpose of publishing is to support and reinforce the loyalty group
9. The "press" is not a source of truth but of reinforcement
10. The intellectuals belief in facts is just propaganda
11. The reward for obtaining power is more power and less oversight
12. Conquering the opposition is the only solutions
13. Laws are an impediment to the group who is supposed to conquer and implement their beliefs
14. Would rather control through indirect means such as religion 
15. Everything is perceived as belong/not-belong, good or evil
16. Individuals cannot think of making their own decisions
17. Societal changes can all be perceived as bad
18. Reaction to bad/evil is to confront, fight, and conquer
19. Fighting evil requires physical actions, bullying, and destroying messengers

1. Reason
2. Order created by precedent and examining each situation
3. Individual can challenge ordering force - "courts"
4. All arguments are intellectual and logical arguments
5. Loyalty to intellectual freedom
6. Only the idea may be argued - personal attacks interfere with solving problems
7. Logical process is important to examining facts
8. Publishing provides facts
9. The "press" preserves intellectual freedom
10. It's hard to argue with warriors who believe intellectuals have ulterior motives for what they say
11. The reward for obtaining power is to become a loved leader
12. Win-win solutions are the only solutions
13. Laws are the main method of maintaining order
14. Would rather control though consensus
15. Everything has shades of gray
16. Individuals want to make decisions
17. Society is always in a state of change
18. Reaction to bad/evil is intellectual understanding and looking for win-win cooperative solutions
19. Fighting bad/evil is an intellectual exercise

1. Group
2. Order created by Chief
3. Individual cannot challenge Chief
4. All arguments are the Chief's arguments
5. Loyalty is to Chief and Tribe
6. "Evil" people challenge Chief
7. Only nature can change facts
8. Everything else is defined and decided by the chief
9. You are expected to leave the tribe if you challenge the chief's perceptions